<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Aren&#8217;t There More Prizes in Science?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.startuphouston.com/2008/08/15/why-arent-there-more-prizes-in-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.startuphouston.com/2008/08/15/why-arent-there-more-prizes-in-science/</link>
	<description>Let's Get Started!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:03:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Graham Randall</title>
		<link>http://www.startuphouston.com/2008/08/15/why-arent-there-more-prizes-in-science/comment-page-1/#comment-21135</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Randall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 04:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startuphouston.com/?p=466#comment-21135</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, Aziz.

I don&#039;t see any reason why prizes can&#039;t encourage discoveries or are limited to leveraging existing technology. What&#039;s the likelihood that the winner of any of Newt&#039;s prizes listed above will not have created any new, innovative technologies along the way?

Granted, prizes probably don&#039;t encourage discoveries to the same extent as grants, but that&#039;s not to say they don&#039;t encourage discovery at all. Prizes have the effect of focussing research. If the NIH distributed 100% of its research budget in prizes, then all research would be aimed at the prizes.

Unfortunately, the system we&#039;re in today is 100% in the other direction. We need some balance--a combination of grants and prizes. Grants to support basic, exploratory research and prizes to encourage technological leaps and to focus research on &lt;em&gt;solutions&lt;/em&gt; to problems of global health.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Aziz.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see any reason why prizes can&#8217;t encourage discoveries or are limited to leveraging existing technology. What&#8217;s the likelihood that the winner of any of Newt&#8217;s prizes listed above will not have created any new, innovative technologies along the way?</p>
<p>Granted, prizes probably don&#8217;t encourage discoveries to the same extent as grants, but that&#8217;s not to say they don&#8217;t encourage discovery at all. Prizes have the effect of focussing research. If the NIH distributed 100% of its research budget in prizes, then all research would be aimed at the prizes.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the system we&#8217;re in today is 100% in the other direction. We need some balance&#8211;a combination of grants and prizes. Grants to support basic, exploratory research and prizes to encourage technological leaps and to focus research on <em>solutions</em> to problems of global health.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aziz Gilani</title>
		<link>http://www.startuphouston.com/2008/08/15/why-arent-there-more-prizes-in-science/comment-page-1/#comment-21133</link>
		<dc:creator>Aziz Gilani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startuphouston.com/?p=466#comment-21133</guid>
		<description>I think that prizes and grants both have their place. Grants encourage discoveries, while prizes encourage the leveraging of existing technologies for a dedicated purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that prizes and grants both have their place. Grants encourage discoveries, while prizes encourage the leveraging of existing technologies for a dedicated purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
